Perhaps I should have titled this post "some consequences of giving away music for free," but then nobody would want to read it. I probably wouldn't want to read it, but since nobody seems to have written about experiences similar to mine, I'm writing it anyway.
I was listening to a Freakonomics podcast this morning called "
There's no such thing as a free appetizer," and it started me thinking about consequences of offering musical stuff to people for free. As a composer I unfortunately came of musical age at the time when music publishing was on the wane. I suppose I caught the tail end of it when I worked with Seesaw Music. I felt very good about the professional relationship I had with Raoul Ronson, and felt that he earned his (and the standard) 90% of the sale of every piece of music he sold because he promoted my music. I got some hefty royalty checks during the last few years of his Raoul's life, which happened to be my first few years as a published composer. After Raoul died they reduced substantially, trickling down to almost nothing. Nobody was there to advocate for me in the company that took over the Seesaw inventory.
I didn't have the resources at the time (or now, come to think of it) to set up my own publishing house for my not-yet-written music, and I did not have the strength of ego at the time (or now, come to think of it) to withstand possible market rejection. In order to offset the price of a high-quality photocopying machine and binding equipment, and renting office space for it (there's no room in our house), I would have had to sell a lot of music. I had a choice to make. Not wanting all my hard work to go to waste sitting in either my drawer or the shelves of a company that wasn't interested in promoting my work, I decided to put everything I wrote from 2006 onward into the Werner Icking Music Archive which was then absorbed into the IMSLP Petrucci Library. I thought of my contributions as a kind of
Tzedakah.
From the numbers on the IMSLP website it seems that a lot of people download my contributions, but it is very rare that I hear from anyone who does (though I am thrilled when someone does write). I rarely hear about performances, which leads me to think that performances are indeed very rare. Occasionally (very occasionally) people write to me asking if I could re-write something for their instrumental combination (and I always do), and once the music is finished I don't hear anything more from them. It's as if my very act of
giving something to someone I do not know makes the thing that I give have so little value that it is not worth acknowledging. It becomes a non-transaction, which becomes, in our market-oriented society, a non-relationship.
Maybe the act of Tzedakah is only properly realized when it involves someone with money giving money to someone without money. I used to think that giving music to people was a form of Tzedakah, but now I question that belief. Here are Maimonides' Eight Levels of Giving (in descending order):
1. Giving an interest-free loan to a person in need; forming a partnership with a person in need; giving a grant to a person in need; finding a job for a person in need; so long as that loan, grant, partnership, or job results in the person no longer living by relying upon others.
2. Giving tzedakah anonymously to an unknown recipient via a person (or public fund) which is trustworthy, wise, and can perform acts of tzedakah with your money in a most impeccable fashion.
3. Giving tzedakah anonymously to a known recipient.
4. Giving tzedakah publicly to an unknown recipient.
5. Giving tzedakah before being asked.
6. Giving adequately after being asked.
7. Giving willingly, but inadequately.
8. Giving "in sadness" (giving out of pity) or giving unwillingly.
In the highest level it is not possible to substitute the word "music" for "tzedakah," or "money," but for the longest time the word "music" seemed to be a sensible substitution to me, particularly in #4. Perhaps, not being a person who deals much in money, I misunderstood the meaning of the word.
2. Giving music anonymously to an unknown recipient via a person (or public fund) which is trustworthy, wise, and can perform acts of tzedakah with your music in a most impeccable fashion. (This would be an entity like the IMSLP.)
3. Giving music anonymously to a known recipient. (I would count instances when the composer is not acknowledged on a program in this group.)
4. Giving music publicly to an unknown recipient.
5. Giving music before being asked.
6. Giving adequately after being asked.
7. Giving willingly, but inadequately.
8. Giving "in sadness" (giving out of pity) or giving unwillingly.
Giving, when reciprocal (in some way or other), is a wonderful thing. When it is not reciprocal (in some way or other) giving creates sadness and emptiness on the part of the person doing the giving. People experience this kind of sadness and emptiness in personal relationships with friends, lovers, and family members, and discuss them with other friends, other family members, and therapists.
Musical relationships (i.e. the relationship between a composer and a person play his or her music) are personal relationships. Perhaps we, as a musical culture, are so used to playing music by people who are either dead or inaccessible that we forget.